One of the advantages of doing assignments is that if it is well-written, I can post it to benefit my readers, or maybe others who need to do similar tasks.
The assignment below requires me to make a comparison of the two sci-fi TV series Heroes and Fringe. If you have seen them, you might also have the same feeling as I have.
Here is an assignment I wrote which came back with an 'A' grade!
TV series are being watched by
viewers globally and viewers love to see their countrymen appearing on the
small screen as much as the big screen. The producers of Heroes understand this
perfectly. In terms of marketing potentials, Heroes displays several large cultures
in the series such as the Indian and the Japanese cultures which definitely
suit the taste of the Asian viewers and the massive Asian markets whereas Fringe
remains a typical wholly America-based FBI-detective TV series. Heroes also
defeats Fringe in terms of depth of thought. Heroes addresses the issues or even
conflicts between traditional beliefs and science and in some ways attempts a
merger of two, conceptually it is more intriguing to look into the deep
philosophical beliefs such as destiny and meanings in life versus the opposing
belief of science and evolution than sole paranormal mysteries in Fringe.
In terms of filming techniques, Heroes
makes use of low-light shooting, night scenes and low key tone in daylight,
pictures are tinted with slight purple, dark blue or grey through the use of
lens filters, which creates various mysterious atmospheres throughout the
episodes; Fringe does not apply lighting effects and
filters as often as Heroes does. The use of a recurring sword-like symbol in some
scenes of Heroes to trigger the viewers’ pursuit of the story is effective but
is slightly overdone at times; Fringe applies similar technique by using frog,
leaf and handprint in between scenes to achieve the same result, but because
they are not shown in the scenes, it is doubtful that these symbols will be
explained in the future.
|
As you can see, this is the writing style expected at the Master's level, highly densed, highly nominalised, and very little non-sense. If you want to know how to write like this, please revise my earlier articles on titled
"Business Writing: How to write like a pro? -- Part 0,1,2,3,4"
Vocabulary:
interlocking -- (adj) firmly joined together, especially by one part fitting into another
intriguing -- (adj) very interesting because of being unusual or mysterious
tint -- (vb) [T] to slightly change the colour of something
pursuit -- (n) [U] when you try to achieve a plan, activity or situation, usually over a long period of time
Resources:
Business Writing: How to write like a pro? @ Locky's English Playground
http://lockyep.blogspot.com/search/label/Writing
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/paranormal_1?q=paranormal+
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/interlocking?q=interlocking
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/tempt?q=tempt
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/intriguing?q=intriguing
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/tint_2
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/pursuit_3