![]() |
Image from i.dailymail.co.uk |
I am glad that 3 of you did try to do the homework I put up on Wednesday.
Before we look into the examples, let me through you a term in computational linguistics -- Lexical Density, meaning how packed a piece of written work is with content words. In simple words, lexical density is how many important words / keywords are there in one sentence compared with unimportant words/non-keywords.
The Learning and Teaching Unit of The University of South Australia has a website on Readability, meaning how easy or difficult is a piece of written work to read or understand. Under the page of content words and lexical density you can find a detail description (with examples) regarding the topic, and you are highly recommended to read it. But maybe before you read it, you can first read my simpler version,
![]() |
Image from Wikipedia |
eg 1 . Armadillo is an animal which has an armour shell and it is similar to leather.
Content words: 7
Total words: 15
Lexical density = 46.7%
eg 2 . Armadillo is an animal with leathery armour shell.
Content words: 5
Total words: 8
Lexical density = 62.5%
eg 3. A leathery armour-shelled armadillo ...
Content words: 4
Total words: 5
Lexical density = 80%
From the above examples, you can see that the higher the lexical density, the more compact the sentence / expression is and the richer the information is. A point to note is that eg 3 isn't even a complete sentence, which means you can still pack more information in it.
Now going back to our example in the previous article:
***********************************************
Version 1:
Yesterday in Hung Hom at the international Mail Centre, a parcel caught on fire. There were cell phone batteries in the parcel. 510 people were cleared from the scene as some people feared that it was a terrorist attack.
Content words: 22 including number
Total words: 39
Lexical density = 56.4%
***********************************************Version 2:
A parcel containing cell phone batteries burst into flames at the International Mail Centre in Hung Hom, sparking fears of a terrorist attack and forcing the evacuation of 510 people yesterday.
Content words: 21 including number
Total words: 31
Lexical density = 67.7%
***********************************************So now, it should be easy to see which one will sound more professional in terms of lexical density. But exactly,
- how can we write using sentence structures that has higher lexical density?
- does "higher lexical density" = "better writing" in ALL CASES?
If you want to know, do follow my Monday posting.
For now, here's a homework for your practice:
Try to increase the lexical density of this paragraph taken from theStandard.com.hk:
Poor show by MTRC
I think MTR Corp did not handle the situation well. It did not give enough information to commuters. There was a chaotic situation because passengers could not find their way easily to other transport modes. Perhaps the MTRC should send more staff and call the police for help in future situations.
|
Resources:
http://lockyep.blogspot.com/2010/11/business-writing-how-to-write-like-pro.html#comments
Lexical Density on Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lexical_density
The Learning and Teaching Unit of The University of South Australia
http://www.unisanet.unisa.edu.au/learn/LearningConnection/?PATH=/Resources/la/Readability/&default=Welcome.htm
Content Words and Lexical Density
http://www.unisanet.unisa.edu.au/Resources/la/Readability/Content%20words%20and%20lexical%20density.htm
Original email from The Standard
http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?we_cat=9&art_id=104379&sid=30124276&con_type=1&d_str=20101101&fc=8
Very very difficult. Very very hard to mainipulate it..
ReplyDeleteAnswer:
In my point, MTR Corp did not handle the situation well by giving not enough information to commuters. Passengers could not find their way to other transport modes easily to causing a chaotic situation. Perhaps the MTRC should send more staff and call the police for help in future.
Revised Answer:
ReplyDeleteIn my point, MTR Corp did not handle the situation well by giving insufficient information to commuters. Passengers could not find their way to other transport modes easily which caused a chaotic situation. Perhaps the MTRC should send more staff and call the police for help in future.
Celia, you are improving. I can see your use of gerund. I will post my answer on Friday. So, the rest of you, try before Friday
ReplyDeleteHi! Locky,
ReplyDeletePlease read my summary as follows:
MTRC giviing insufficient information to commuters who found their way difficult to other transport modes, causing a chaotic situation. To handle the situation better in future, it should send more staff and call the police for help.
Thanks,
Mei
Thanks Locky, coz i am always uncertain the grammar i do..
ReplyDelete